Unexpectedly, red states might be next to raise minimum wage

Unexpectedly, red states might be next to raise minimum wage

By Daniel Salazar
McClatchy Washington Bureau

September 24, 2014

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama isn’t expected to get the federal minimum-wage hike he’s wanted anytime soon, but advocates hope that public support for the issue gets a boost from an unusual set of states this Election Day.

Alaska, Arkansas, Nebraska and South Dakota – four solid-red states whose voters often oppose the president’s agenda – might be next to raise the wage floor of America’s lowest-paid hourly workers. On Nov. 4, they’ll vote on ballot measures to increase their minimum wages.

Some advocates hope that victories on the ballot, especially in four Republican strongholds, will change the national narrative of the economic debate.

“It becomes a lot harder for members of Congress who might not support these kinds of things to continually say ‘no’ when it comes up in Washington,” said Josh Levin, a vice president at the left-leaning Ballot Initiative Strategy Center, which supports activists on state ballot measures.

States have already been busy on the minimum wage this year. Ten state legislatures and the District of Columbia have raised their minimum wages in 2014, according to the bipartisan National Conference of State Legislatures.

However, the legislation mostly passed in blue states such as Vermont, Massachusetts and Hawaii. Only one of those 10 states, West Virginia, voted for Republican Mitt Romney in the 2012 presidential election.

The issue has gained a lot of attention this year.

Earlier this month, fast-food workers across the country participated in a strike in favor of a $15-per-hour “livable” wage, more than double the current federal floor of $7.25. The Seattle City Council passed a $15 hourly rate in June, and some activists are pushing that figure elsewhere in Washington state.

The ballot measures in Alaska, Arkansas, Nebraska and South Dakota would bring about much smaller increases. But that doesn’t bother Steve Copley,the chairman of the Give Arkansas a Raise Now coalition.

“Every penny that somebody who is working hard can get helps,” Copley said.

Activists must be realistic about what increases they push for at the polls, said Peggy Shorey, the director of state government relations at the AFL-CIO, whose state federations support the ballot initiatives.

“Arkansas is not the same as Seattle,” she said.

The current $6.25-per-hour state minimum wage makes Arkansas one of three states lower than the federal floor for hourly wages. Only Georgia and Wyoming are lower, according to the U.S. Department of Labor. (When state minimum wages differ from the federal rate, the higher rate is adhered to in that particular state, as employers don’t want to violate federal law.)

Last year, about 91,000 workers earned the federal minimum wage or below – employees who earn tips, for example – in the four states with November ballot proposals, according to the Labor Department’s Bureau of Labor Statistics. However, thousands more would be affected as the state wage floors rose gradually.

While all four initiatives would begin wage increases Jan. 1, the approaches are split on their long-term considerations of how to link the minimum wage to cost-of-living increases.

Under Alaska’s ballot proposal, the minimum wage would be tied to increases in the Anchorage Consumer Price Index caused by inflation starting in 2017. South Dakota’s initiative would raise the minimum wage based on changes to a national CPI metric starting in 2016.

Tying annual increases to CPI fluctuations is controversial. Opponents in South Dakota say it’s one of their biggest concerns of the ballot proposal there.

“The economies in Florida, California and New Jersey are going to dictate how employers in our state are going to have to do (wage) increases every year,” said Shawn Lyons, the executive director of the South Dakota Retailers Association, a wage-hike opponent.

Ten states, including Florida and Washington, have minimum wages legally tied to CPI metrics, according to the Department of Labor. New Jersey will join them in January, with the District of Columbia, Minnesota and Michigan scheduled to follow suit in upcoming years.

Copley said such a measure in Arkansas would have been a non-starter at the polls. “We didn’t feel like we could get it passed,” he said.

Instead, the minimum hourly rates would top off at $8.50 per hour in 2017 in Arkansas and $9 per hour in 2016 in Nebraska under their ballot proposals.

Illinois, considered a left-leaning state, is holding a vote in November on raising its $8.25 minimum hourly wage to $10, but the advisory referendum is nonbinding and doesn’t carry the weight of law.

Republican state Sen. Kyle McCarter sees that as election-year political maneuvering.

“The Dems are loading the ballot with referendums that mean nothing, just so they can get their traditional supporters out to the polls to vote for them,” he told McClatchy’s Belleville News-Democrat in May.

The executive director of the South Dakota Democratic Party, Zach Crago, said that was partially the point. He said the proposal to raise South Dakota’s minimum wage made for good midterm politics.

“It creates contrasts, which are good in elections,” Crago said. “It also motivates voters. Raising the minimum wage is a pocketbook issue, when people can clearly tie their vote to their way of life.”

Former Alaska labor commissioner Ed Flanagan, who’s a wage-hike advocate, said the Alaskan campaign had benefited from a grass-roots union presence. At 23.1 percent of the state’s wage and salary workers, Alaska’s union membership rate is more than double the national rate, according to BLS data.

Some minimum-wage-hike opponents think the getting-out-the-vote effect of the ballot proposals is a one-way street. Nebraska Taxpayers for Freedom President Doug Kagan said the minimum-wage ballot proposal was unlikely to excite voters on his side of the debate.

“The minimum wage issue is more important to the Democratic voters than to the Republican voters” in Nebraska, said Kagan, whose conservative group opposes raising the state minimum wage.

It might be an uphill battle for wage hike opponents before voters head to the polls.

“Our polls would indicate we have a lot of work to do to educate people on some of our concerns,” said Michael Held, a lobbyist with the South Dakota Farm Bureau, which opposes that state’s proposal.

In August, 58 percent of surveyed potential Alaskan voters supported the state initiative there, according to Public Policy Polling, a Democratic polling firm.

A poll by the Arkansas publication Talk Business and Hendrix College found in April that 79 percent of surveyed Arkansas voters supported their state’s ballot initiative.

The Arkansas campaign doesn’t need a strong state labor presence to be successful, said Jay Barth, a political science professor at Hendrix College who helped craft and analyze the April poll.

“Arkansas has more of a populist tradition than some of the other Southern states that are more conservative on economic issues,” Barth said.

Five Southern states _ South Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee, Mississippi and Alabama _ have no state minimum wage at all, deferring to the federal rate.

Shorey, with the AFL-CIO, said she thought successful ballot measures in November could help families and change the national discussion on the minimum wage debate.

“Red states passing it reinforces this doesn’t have to be a totally partisan issue,” she said.

Email: dsalazar@mcclatchydc.com

Read more here: http://www.bnd.com/2014/09/24/3419129_unexpectedly-red-states-might.html?rh=1#storylink=cpy